Dr.
Antonia Monteiro (Assistant Professor in Yale University since
2006; see image 1). One
of her interest is the study of the origins of wing butterflies eyespot (image 2). Based on the theory of co-option (or exaptation, read blog# 13 for more information), that explains that genes
possibly shift in the function of a trait during evolution. For example, a
trait can evolve because on a time can served for a particular function, but
subsequently it may come to serve another function.
According to Monteiro and her group (2012) they discover that from both morphological and developmental perspectives of homology [1,3,4], nymphalid eyespots and an associated gene cluster arose a single time, early in the evolution of the Nymphalidae (see image 3). In addition, this single origin, multiple losses of gene expression have occurred, suggesting a novel means in which complex traits originate: from an initial gene regulatory network co-option followed by stream-lining of extraneous network elements. Moreover, they also found that the origin of eyespots was concurrent with the origin of the gene expression patterns, approximately 90 million years ago. This finding suggests that complex traits such as butterfly eyespots may initially evolve by re-deploying pre-existing gene regulatory networks, which are subsequently trimmed of genes that are unnecessary in the novel context.
In the study, they obtain the results from a morphological assessment of homology; they used Mayr’s definition where ‘‘a feature is homologous in two or more taxa if it can be traced back to the same feature in the presumptive common ancestor.’’ [2]. If eyespots are homologous, there should be a single origin of this trait; in contrast, multiple origins of eyespots within the Nymphalidae would demonstrate that the traits are not homologous [7]. (see Figure 1 and 2).
Image 2. Eyespot in butterfly wing |
According to Monteiro and her group (2012) they discover that from both morphological and developmental perspectives of homology [1,3,4], nymphalid eyespots and an associated gene cluster arose a single time, early in the evolution of the Nymphalidae (see image 3). In addition, this single origin, multiple losses of gene expression have occurred, suggesting a novel means in which complex traits originate: from an initial gene regulatory network co-option followed by stream-lining of extraneous network elements. Moreover, they also found that the origin of eyespots was concurrent with the origin of the gene expression patterns, approximately 90 million years ago. This finding suggests that complex traits such as butterfly eyespots may initially evolve by re-deploying pre-existing gene regulatory networks, which are subsequently trimmed of genes that are unnecessary in the novel context.
Image 3. Nymphalidae subfamilies |
In the study, they obtain the results from a morphological assessment of homology; they used Mayr’s definition where ‘‘a feature is homologous in two or more taxa if it can be traced back to the same feature in the presumptive common ancestor.’’ [2]. If eyespots are homologous, there should be a single origin of this trait; in contrast, multiple origins of eyespots within the Nymphalidae would demonstrate that the traits are not homologous [7]. (see Figure 1 and 2).
Figure 2. Regulatory network simplification in a complex trait. Following the origin of a complex trait and its underlying developmental gene regulatory network, genes that are non-functional or unnecessary may be subsequently removed from the network (genes 2 and 3), without eliminating the trait. Genes expressed in homologous traits of all taxa may represent a ‘core network’ of regulatory elements (genes 1 and 4) that are necessary for the development of the novel trait.
References:
|
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario